Panoptic Research

Share this post

Does Uniswap's Most Traded Asset Violate Geometric Brownian Motion?

research.panoptic.xyz

Discover more from Panoptic Research

The perpetual, oracle-free options protocol. We are the best option.
Continue reading
Sign in
#ResearchBites

Does Uniswap's Most Traded Asset Violate Geometric Brownian Motion?

GBM Assumptions in Financial Models: A Case Study on Uniswap V3's ETH-USDC Pool

guil-lambert
Mar 17, 2023
Share this post

Does Uniswap's Most Traded Asset Violate Geometric Brownian Motion?

research.panoptic.xyz
Share

View on Twitter

One of the core assumptions behind financial models is that prices follow a geometric brownian motion (GBM) — e.g. Black-Scholes. Does the price of the most traded asset in Uniswap v3 also follow a GBM? Let's find out! 👇

We will analyze the 5, 30, and 100bps ETH-USDC UniV3 pools. The 5bps pool gets 90% of all volume and, zooming in on the price action, appear to have a smaller "per trade impact" than the 30 and 100bps pools What is the size distribution of the price jumps for each pool?

Image
Image
Image

If the price were a GBM, then the size of the price jumps would be normally distributed. Instead, the price jumps are narrowly peaks around size~0. They also have a kurtosis that's much larger than a normal distribution's (high kurtosis = long-tail event are more likely).

Image

We model the price S of an asset using a geometric Brownian motion, ie., we assume that S satisfies the following Stochastic Differential Equation:

\(\begin{align}\\ \frac{\mathrm{d}S_t}{S_t}&=\underbrace{\mu\mathrm{d}t}_\text{drift}+\underbrace{\sigma\mathrm{d}W_t}_\text{volatility},\\ \text{with }& W_t \text{ Gaussian noise} \end{align}\)

Indeed, the distributions can't be fit to a gaussian. An exponential distribution also fails to cover the distribution's "long-tail". Surprisingly, the size of each price jump fits very closely to a power law distribution. (CT: tag someone who may know why it's a power law)

Image

Key insights:

  • The 5bps pool gets 90% of all USDC volume

  • The 5bps pool likely follows the CEX price more closely due to its 0.05% arbitrage fee

  • The distribution of price jumps does not follow a normal distribution

  • The price jumps follow a power law distribution (!)

Questions/Caveats:

  • Can a GBM have a power law random process?

  • What is the impact of a large kurtosis on price action?

  • These distribution may be colored by uneven time steps

  • A lot of the volume is arbitrage and not reflect "organic" order flow.

We may tackles these questions in a future. In the meantime, please follow @Panoptic_xyz for your daily dose of #ResearchBites and other important updates!


This content is for educational purposes only and should not be relied upon as financial advice.

Follow on Twitter

Share this post

Does Uniswap's Most Traded Asset Violate Geometric Brownian Motion?

research.panoptic.xyz
Share
Next
Comments
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Panoptic
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing